Canada Immigration Services at an affordable Price

Optimum Immigration is an immigration consultant in India which share in optimism and believe that Canada offers excellent opportunities to those who wish to become a part of its heritage.

We provide simplified solutions to individual immigrant applicants seeking to relocate to Canada. Whether you wish to lodge an application or need to explore your immigration options with our dedicated team of advisors, Optimum Immigration Services provides a range of services designed to simplify your application visa in India and maximize your chance of success.

We are confident that we will be able to assist you in finding the affordable immigration solution you are looking for. Our mission is to provide our clients with accurate and quality work at affordable rates. We want to save our clients time and money, without sacrificing accuracy, practicality, and quality. Our initial advice is free, and we charge a low flat fee with no hidden costs.

We do not charge by the hour, which makes it easy for you to budget your journey to Canada effectively. Our goals at Optimum Immigration are to provide Canada immigration Services India at an affordable price, give you massive amount of useful assistance, personalized guidance and help, so that you can achieve your goal such as Canada work permit visa.

Optimum Immigration provides simplified solutions to individuals, and serves as a foundation for continued economic growth. Canada is a land of opportunity and abounds with economic opulence, world renowned health care and retirement plans, affordable education options, safe and secure environment, and an abundance of land, clean air, and fresh water supplies. Optimum Immigration also provides permanent resident visa for Canada and it embrace your future, and bring the heritage of your past to a place where you and your family will be proud to refer to Canada as your home.

What US Immigration Services Looks for on a Visa Petition

US immigration services (USCIS) sets out strict guidelines for each visa petition, and they expect all applicants to follow them. Fortunately, it doesn’t have to be a guessing game to figure out what USCIS is looking for; the information is actually pretty straightforward. Here’s what you can do to meet the expectations of us immigration services with your visa petition.

Submitting a successful Visa Petition to US Immigration Services

Completeness

Before you start filling out any forms, read through the filing instructions. Make sure you understand exactly what is required of you, and follow the steps to create a complete petition. Incomplete petitions are likely to result in a delay to your application, if not a rejection. Go over your petition and check the details. If using a pen, do the instructions specify what type of ink you need to use? If you typed the application, make sure that you are not using hard to read fonts or colors. Did you sign where indicated? Did you submit all applicable evidence? Did you include the filing fee in the correct amount? Remember that if you submit an incorrect fee or an unsigned application, it will be rejected.

Accuracy

Complete your petition as honestly and accurately as possible. There should be no inconsistencies throughout the paperwork. You want to avoid making US immigration services suspicious about your petition. If you make a mistake while filling out your forms, scratch out the incorrect information and initial the correction or start again. Do not change or alter legal documents or evidence in any way. This can lead to an inaccurate petition. Misrepresentations on your petition can be considered fraud, and USCIS may deny your application, as well as deny immigration benefits to other people involved.

Supporting Documentation

Supporting documents play a key role in helping US immigration services determine the eligibility of your case. Your supporting documents should be clear, legible, and any document in a foreign language should be accompanied by a full English translation. In most cases, copies of documents are admissible as evidence, though immigration will sometimes ask to see the original.

If you do not send all of the required supporting documents, your petition will be put on hold until you submit them. If you are asked to provide a document that doesn’t exist, you must prove that the document doesn’t exist, along with an explanation as to why. If any evidence is missing, US immigration services typically issues a request for evidence and supplies a deadline by which you must submit it.

Managing Immigration Service Processes

Are you struggling with immigration service rules and procedures that have you frustrated and overwhelmed? This area of the law is not easy to navigate. In fact, for many people, it can be nearly impossible to find a way around the restrictions and legal limits put in place. That is why you need a professional company, preferably an attorney, working directly with you regarding your case. It does not matter if you are living in the us, hope to be or trying to just get a work visa, you need a legal provider that can offer you the assistance that is necessary to navigate these difficult processes.

Ever-Changing Laws

One of the reasons many are turning to an immigration service like this is because laws on immigrants continue to change. They are changing both at the federal and at the state level. Unless you are familiar with these laws as well as how the changes affect your situation, you could make mistakes that could potentially lead to your loss of an opportunity to stay in the country. Let the pros manage the process for you, as they will stay up to date on it on an ongoing basis.

Who Needs Legal Help?

Many people will benefit from having legal help with immigration laws. This includes those who wish to come to the united states either to live or to work. It also includes those who are in the united states right now who may wish to stay. For those who may be illegal immigrants right now in the united states, with the help of an attorney you may be able to overcome these legal limitations and not be sent away. The key is to work with an attorney that can protect your right to remain here.

There’s No Risk

Are you unsure if there is anything that can be done to help you? Perhaps you are struggling with the risk of having to be deported. No matter what situation you are in right now, it is not a risk to talk to a lawyer. These professionals work for you and therefore they will not put you at risk. More so, under the laws in the united states, what you tell your attorney is confidential. That means he or she will not share it with anyone else.

Find and use an immigration service to help you through this process. Doing so could mean staying in the us or getting the visa you need to start working. The longer you wait, though, the more difficult it will be for you to get this type of help. Discuss your situation with a legal professional specializing in this area of the law. That may make all of the difference.

The benefits of an Efficient UK Immigration Service

Immigration is often a very sensitive subject, but one imagines that most reasonable people would agree upon two things.

Firstly, that it is desirable that people who wish to come to the united kingdom and work in those areas where there is a shortage of capable staff and where their talents are sorely needed should be able to do so.

Secondly, that a process needs ideally to exist through which immigration can take place through the established channels and in accordance with all the rules and regulations that exist to ensure it is properly managed. We have heard all the sad stories of trafficking, smuggling and exploitation.

We have heard about ruthless individuals who wax fat on the misery of those who will give their last penny to board a truck to a place of employment which pays them very little and puts them to work of a kind which often pays no regard to even the most basic of health and safety considerations.

Fortunately on the other side of the coin there exists the respectable UK immigration service available for those wishing to acquire a UK visa and immigrate legally and properly, to work and to live. Consultants are regulated by the OISC (Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner) and offer specialist advice on UK immigration law and on visas.

Immigration is by no means a simple or uniform process. There are fiancé visas, the uk marriage visa,, visitor and tourist visas, same day tier 1, same day tier 4, tier 2, indefinite leave to remain, same day indefinite leave to remain and myriad other options. Documentation specific to one particular country or part of the world such as the same day China visa can also be provided by some specialists in the field.

Often a free visa assessment can enable the potential visitor to gain a preliminary idea of which options are open, information that can frequently prove invaluable when considering how to use the process to best effect. It pays to use advice that a service user knows is trustworthy. As well as being regulated by the OISC it is helpful when the service provider is capable of communicating in different languages. All the information should be explained and made available in the simplest terms.

Being in receipt of all the information enables the client to make an informed and confident choice on the basis of certain knowledge.

Reminders In Sending Petitions To an Immigration Service

Did you think that hiring an immigration attorney would automatically solve all of your immigration issues? You are the most important part of the case here-not your lawyer. So, what must you do?

Follow instructions.

So many people become dumb during the most crucial moments in their life, usually due to stress, and such carelessness could cost them quite a lot. There is nothing more important than reading instructions carefully. The law does not exempt those who fail to read guidelines.

When filling out forms, read what form you are writing on and read the requirements for the petitions. Then, check the forms thoroughly for errors after completing them. Correcting mistakes in the future can be inconvenient. Save yourself from the hassle by perusing the forms you have filled out.

Ask questions.

If you do not understand a question in a form, you can ask your immigration lawyer to clarify it for you. If there are other things that confuse you, ask your lawyer again. It is important that you understand everything in the process.

Send the petition to the appropriate immigration service office.

You would know if you sent the petition or application to the wrong office when the documents are returned to you. Keep in mind that it takes about 30 days for the Immigration Service to return the forms to applicants. By that time, you might be out of status already, and your case would be denied. The lesson is to take note of the right address. It is not uncommon for government offices to change addresses. It’s not their fault if you missed out on the new address of the Immigration Service office.

Did you enclose requested documents?

All requested documents should be sent with the right filing fees. Include an insufficient filing fee and your documents will be sent back to you. As previously stated, it takes about a month for the Immigration Service to return your documents. If your petition lacks required forms, you will be notified about the missing documents. Submitting incomplete documents delays the processing of your request.

Choose a current priority date.

The Immigration Service or State Department will reject your petition if your priority date is not current. There is so much stress in making sure that your petition is not rejected. Rejection of your petition or application due to not following guidelines will lead to annoying hassles.

Don’t miss the deadline.

Filing petitions is not for procrastinators. File your petition early on, way before the deadline. Missing the deadline means losing your chance of getting your petition approved. What are the consequences of a denied petition? One is you fall out of status and you become banned for ten years. Your visa may also be rendered void.

Do not send original documents.

Usually, original copies of documents are not required. These copies should be under your possession. However, photocopies of the documents you surrender should be certified true copies. If you are asked to send the originals for inspection, tell the government agency to return them. Government agencies can lose your documents, so it’s better to secure copies.

Make sure to get the official receipts.

When you send mails to the Immigration Court or any government agency, be sure to obtain the official receipt, as this will prove that you have sent your documents to them.

Know Your Rights When Filing Documents With the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

If you are going to be dealing with US Citizenship and Immigration Services, obtain legal counsel or find an accredited representative to assist in the process of filing applications or petitions. Those applying or petitioning for anything on your behalf are required to file a form G-28 – Notice of entry of appearance as attorney or representative.

Within the borders of the US only attorneys or accredited representatives are allowed to talk to the USCIS for you and get information back. Outside the borders of the US, a practicing lawyer or attorney in that country may act on your behalf. If you can’t afford legal representation, ask about free or low-cost immigration legal services.

Any attorney chosen must be in good standing in his or her state. In other words, they can’t be under any orders restricting their practice. Before you pay for any legal services, know your attorney and ask to see their license to practice. Call the state Bar Association, or check their website and verify they are indeed members. If the attorney won’t provide you with this information, find another one.

Accredited representatives must be authorized (and work for a recognized organization) to practice before the Immigration Courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals and/or USCIS. To make sure the representative you want does have accreditation, ask to see a Board of Immigration Appeals official decision designating them as such. If they refuse to show you this documentation, find another representative. These representatives will either charge a token fee or none at all.

Notary publics, notarios and immigration consultants are not able to represent you, and they must not give legal advice of any sort. They are not considered to be qualified in legal or immigration and naturalization matters. They may only charge a small fee for helping to fill out USCIS forms. Notarios in the united states are not attorneys. Beware of whom you pay for advice on immigration issues.

Protect Yourself From Immigration Fraud

For many people, immigration to the united states is a way to rejoin family, find a better job, or simply to experience something new. While the U. S. welcomes legal immigrants, they take immigration fraud very seriously. People can pose as immigration experts in order to steal your personal information and commit immigration fraud. Thus, it is very important to take steps to protect your name from being sullied by immigration fraud.

Immigration fraud occurs when people use your good name and reputation to perhaps gain illegal access into the U. S. for their own benefit. They may also use it to ferry unwelcome immigrants into the united states. This can besmirch your name as it may be associated with criminal activities and fraud. Therefore, the united states Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, offers several tips to help you protect yourself from immigration fraud.

First, you need an attorney to help you with your immigration paperwork. In some countries, a “notario” is an attorney. However, do not confuse this with a U. S. notary or notary public. Notaries, notarios, and immigration consultants are not allowed to represent your case. Only a licensed attorney or otherwise accredited representative can act as your go-between with USCIS. When you are looking to apply to immigrate to the U. S., double-check your attorney or representative’s credentials to make sure that this person has the right status to communicate to USCIS on your behalf.

Next, there are several other things that you should consider when making your case for immigration, including:

-Do not sign any blank paperwork or immigration documents

-Do not sign any documents that contain false information

-Always make sure that you thoroughly understand what each document says before signing it

-Do not allow other people to keep your originals

-Make copies of any information that you submit to USCIS or that are submitted on your behalf

-Get a receipt for every payment that you make to your legal representative or immigration services

Lastly, if you do believe that you are a victim of immigration fraud, report any evidence of this crime to USCIS or the Attorney General’s office as soon as possible. This way, you can try to prevent someone from entering the U. S. in your name. This is important because any fraud committed in your name can make it very difficult for you to truly immigrate to the U. S. in the future.

The current State of American Immigration

One thing is certain about the future of us Immigration: the process is constantly changing. This article looks briefly at the past year and the issues that have arisen in the field of US Immigration.

American immigration rules are subject to constant changes. However in recent years the rate of change has accelerated greatly. Some attribute this to the organizational changes made to the Immigration system itself. At one time, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was under the jurisdiction of the united states Attorney General. Now United states Immigration matters are dealt with under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security.

Further compounding the changes to the Immigration system are the proposed changes to be made to Immigration law should recently proposed changes be made to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Under the current provisions of the INA same sex couples are not allowed to petition for Immigration benefits based upon marriage to a same sex partner. There have been numerous recent attempts to repeal this restriction. At the time of this writing, none of the proposed legislation on this issue has been passed by either House of the Legislative Branch of the united states Federal Government.

Recently, a bill was proposed in the us Congress that would make sweeping changes to the American Immigration system. Commonly referred to as “Comprehensive Immigration Reform, ” or “CIR” for short, this initiative seeks to rectify perceived injustices in the current United States visa process. The ultimate impact of the CIR movement remains to be seen.

An interesting aspect of the current Immigration environment within the past year is the increasing attention that immigration fraud is getting from the new York Attorney General’s office. This attention to fraudulent activity has been most apparent in the current Attorney General’s attitude toward those who would take advantage of the lack of consumer sophistication on the part of the immigrant community. This endeavor to thwart illegal activity should be embraced by the community at large.

When this article was written, the K1 visa was still a highly utilized travel document for those traveling to America in order to re-unite with a fiance. Also, the K3 marriage visa is still commonly used by those with an alien spouse. Those interested in filing for a K-1 or K-3 visa should look into filing a well-founded I-129f petition.

USCIS: The united states Citizenship and Immigration Service is the main adjudicator of K visa applications and it is in their position as adjudicators that the American Department of Homeland Security pre-screens virtually all family based visa applicants to ensure that they are both eligible for benefits and do not pose a foreseeable threat to the united states. The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Service offers one more layer of security as it is their responsibility to inspect and admit aliens at ports of entry in america.

A look at Some U. S. Immigration Court Problems

While asylum decisions should always be fair and impartial, this is not always the case given the wide discretion immigration judges are given in deciding such cases, the lack of precedential decisions, and the fact that many of the immigration judges have come from the enforcement arm of the immigration service and all are hired by the Attorney General of the united states. These factors necessarily place the institutional role of immigration judges in conflict with expectations of fairness and impartiality in deciding asylum cases.

Those who are new to immigration court practice and unacquainted with the workings of immigration court often fail to understand why the immigration courts function so differently than our Article III, Article 1, and our state courts. In order for a wider world to understand how the immigration courts function it is important to reveal and discuss some of the recent problems in our United States immigration courts.

During the last decade, our immigration courts have wrestled with disparate asylum outcomes, both among the various immigration courts, and within the same immigration courts; an immigration judge hiring scandal between 2004 and 2006 that left many immigration positions vacant; the implementation of a 22-point Plan to improve the functioning of the immigration court; the backlog of the immigration caseload beginning in 2005; and the perpetual need to standardize immigration court rules and procedures.

Disparate Asylum Outcomes

Immigration practitioners such as myself often believed that asylum seekers were not receiving proper justice because of the disparities in grants of asylum at the trial level in the various immigration courts. Moreover, there were often disparities in outcomes within the same immigration courts. Professors Ramji-Nogales, Schoenholtz, and Schrag of Georgetown Law School in their Asylum Study have described the differing outcomes in asylum decisions as “Refugee Roulette. ”

The study is a monumental piece of work that has been cited by scholars and others interested in refugee law. The Asylum Study examined asylum outcomes in Immigration Courts from 2000 through 2004 for asylum seekers from what they consider Asylum Producing Countries (APC’s). They discovered that even for asylum seekers from countries that produce a relatively high percentage of successful asylees, there are serious disparities among immigration courts in the rates at which they grant asylum to nationals of five of those countries: Albania, China, Ethiopia, Liberia and Russia.

The drafters of the Asylum Study opine that the explanation for the differences between the courts could be “simply cultural” – some courts are more likely to grant asylum while others may be especially tough on all asylum seekers. Also, differences from one region may be due to differences in the populations of asylum seekers in different geographic locations. These explanations may be true, but the question remains: is true justice being properly served with respect to asylum seekers or are they being subjected to “Refugee Roulette? ”

Possible Causes of Disparities Among Immigration Judges

Judging can be difficult in any forum. It is especially difficult with respect to asylum claims because the required persecution must have taken place in a foreign country and may have occurred a great while ago with few witnesses and little documentation. Furthermore, immigration judges are required to make credibility determinations in each case and the applicants’ credibility may be suspect.

Statistics reveal that the five largest immigration courts had immigration judges who were consistent outliers when it came to asylum decisions. From one-third to three-quarters of the judges on these courts granted asylum in APC cases at rates more than 50 percent greater or more than 50 percent less than the national average. The authors of the Asylum Study arrived at the conclusion that discrepancies in the grant rates between judges in the same court may be because of different geographic populations of asylum seekers in different regions. It may also be that certain asylum seekers may come from certain ethnic groups that have similarly viable asylum claims.

The Asylum Study revealed that the single most important factor affecting the outcome of an asylum seeker’s case was whether the applicant was represented by counsel. Represented asylum seekers were granted asylum at a rate of 45. 6%, almost three times as high as the 16. 3% grant rate for those without legal counsel. The number of dependents that an asylum seeker brought with her to the U. S. played a large role in increasing the chance of an asylum grant. Their analysis found that an asylum seeker with no dependents has a 42. 3% grant rate, having one dependent increases the grant rate to 48. 2%. It could be that asylum seekers who bring children in addition to a spouse appear more credible or some immigration judges may be more sympathetic to asylum seekers who have a family to protect.

The Asylum Study also found that gender of the judge had a significant impact on the likelihood that asylum would be granted. Female immigration judges granted asylum at a rate of 53. 8%, while male judges granted asylum at a rate of 37. 3%. The statistical calculations show that an asylum seeker whose case is assigned to a female judge had a 44 percent better chance of prevailing than if there is a case assigned to a male judge. This may be significant in that there are far fewer female immigration judges than male judges. Only approximately 35 percent of the 263 immigration judges are women.

The EOIR Hiring Scandal

In the early 2000’s the case-loads of the country’s immigration courts was rising while the number of immigration judges was simultaneously declining. The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), a branch of the U. S Justice Department which oversees the immigration courts, asked Congress for additional funding to hire more immigration judges. However, the reputation of the EOIR was tarnished by the discovery of an illegal political hiring scandal that took place from the spring of 2004 until December 2006. I will write more on the hiring scandal in a later article.

The Attorney General’s 2006 Plan for Reform

In the wake of the hiring scandal and criticism from several federal circuit court rulings that sharply criticized the immigration courts, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez issued a 22- Point Plan for improving the operation of the immigration courts. It is not the objective of this article to delve deeply into the implementation of all of the entire reform effort, but I will briefly examine some of the positive changes that have emerged from its implementation.

On June 5, 2009, the EOIR produced a fact Sheet detailing measures to improve the EOIR. According to the 2009 Fact Sheet, fifteen of the twenty-two proposed reforms had been enacted. These included: obtaining funding to hire additional immigration judges and field supervisors for immigration courts; drafting an immigration examination for all new judges; installing digital recording services in most, but not all, the immigration court rooms; and producing an online practice manual for the immigration court. The reforms also included training for new judges and additional training for current judges. As of July 2012 no sanctions had been granted to the immigration judges or the judges of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to hold attorneys or parties in contempt.

The training plans consisted of expanded training for new immigration judges on legal and procedural issues; a mentoring program for new judges; and periodic training on management. For the first time there was a joint legal conference in 2009 for immigration judges and BIA members. A Code of Conduct for Immigration Judges had been implemented in 2011 under the Obama Administration as well as the completion of installation of digital audio recording systems in all of the immigration courtrooms.

There is statistical evidence that the reforms have helped. The central finding of a 2009 report on the subject contends that judge-by-judge asylum disparities in the Immigration Courts are down. Court data shows that disparity rates have declined in ten of fifteen immigration courts that decide the bulk of all asylum matters. In New york the disparity rate among judges in Asylum cases has dropped by a quarter and in Miami the range among judges in their denial rates dropped almost two thirds from their previous levels. This indicates that justice is being better served for asylum seekers in these busy immigration courts.

If disparity rates have declined in ten of the fifteen immigration courts that hear the bulk of asylum claims this is real progress toward a fairer and more impartial system. Training for new immigration judges and the judicial mentoring programs have helped many new judges take their cases more seriously. However, this drop in disparity rates may well also be caused by better lawyering in those ten courts where there has been a drop in disparity rates. We know that an applicant has a better chance of succeeding if represented by counsel and so the implementation of the reforms of the 22-point plan may not necessarily be totally responsible for the drop in asylum disparity rates.

The Immigration Court Backlog

Our immigration courts are backlogged, which denies swift justice for asylum seekers. There has been a backlog of approximately 300, 000 cases awaiting adjudication. The growing immigration court backlog is not a recent problem, but has been steadily growing since at least 2005. One important cause for this problem was the Bush Administration’s failure to fill vacant and newly-funded immigration judge positions during the period of the political hiring scandal. Government filings seeking deportation orders increased between Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 and (FY) 2008 by thirty percent while the number of immigration judges on the bench saw little increase and for some periods fell. Subsequent hiring to fill these vacancies during the Obama Administration has not been sufficient to handle all the cases that wait attention.

Although there is still a backlog in the immigration courts, the Obama administration instituted two initiatives to help clear the backlog. During the first quarter of 2012, immigration courts issued 2, 429 fewer deportation orders than in the fourth quarter of 2011. Thus, the proportion of cases resulting in an order of deportation fell slightly to 64. 1 percent. In over a third of all cases, the individual was allowed to stay, at least temporarily, in the U. S.

This historic drop in deportations began in August of 2011 when the Obama Administration initiated a review of its 300, 000 court case backlog. The stated goal of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) review was to better prioritize and reduce the backup of pending matters that led to lengthy delays in immigration court proceedings of noncitizens it wanted to deport. To achieve this longer term objective, ICE attorneys assisted by court clerks, law clerks and paralegals had been redirected in a dramatic effort – part of this prosecution discretion (PD) initiative – to review all 300, 000 cases to prioritize which to focus upon. A consequent drop in overall case dispositions occurred while these reviews were being carried out. As a result, overall court dispositions during the first quarter of 2012 fell to 50, 489 – the lowest level since 2002.

Another Obama administration initiative has resulted in fewer deportations. On June 15, 2012, the President announced a policy to grant young undocumented noncitizens a chance to work and study in the U. S. without fear of deportation. Under the new policy, ICE would stop attempting to deport these undocumented noncitizens who are under 30 years old, came to the U. S. as children and are otherwise law abiding. It has been estimated that as many as 800, 000 such undocumented residents now in the U. S. could qualify for this new status.

Need for Standardizing Immigration Court Rules

The final problem this article will explore is the need for standardized rules and procedures for the immigration courts. As of the time of writing, there are now 59 immigration courts spread across 27 states of the U. S., Puerto Rico, and in the North Mariana Islands with a total of 263 sitting immigration judges. However, there are no set or standardized rules of procedure for the immigration courts.

One scholar has commented on the 22-Point Plan for improvement of the immigration courts contending, “the proposed reforms, while greatly needed, fall short because they fail to include one of the basic tenants of our American court system – rules. It is hard to play by them, invoke them, or enforce them if there are none. ” Some basic immigration court procedures are set forth in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Yet, in everyday practice in different immigration courts one will find locally accepted, but unpublished, procedures that are inconsistent with respect to when exhibits must be filed, marking exhibits, and how much hearsay will be allowed at an asylum hearing. Each immigration court seems to have its own set of entrenched customary practices.

Conclusion

Our immigration courts are busy tribunals wherein appointed immigration judges must decide in many cases who should be granted asylum and who should be denied. It should be a system that strives to be fair and impartial in its decision making concerning those fleeing persecution. More often than not the immigration courts do not appear to be fair and impartial in their decisions.

In examining recent statistics on asylum, it is heartening to find that asylum case filings are down. However, grants of asylum are higher than they have been in the last twenty-five years. This is a wonderful trend. Nevertheless, over the years there have been disparities in grants of asylum among various immigration courts, as well as disparities in such decisions between judges on the same court. The Asylum Study findings that i have cited in this article serve to reinforce and give statistical support to what I and other immigration court practitioners have often believed: while an ideal court system should be fair and impartial, more often than not, a request for asylum by a noncitizen becomes a game of “Refugee Roulette” in our current immigration court system.

Sadly, this means the outcome of the case might depend more upon arbitrary factors such as the judge to whom the case is assigned, whether one has counsel, and the ethnic and gender identity of the judge, instead of the facts of the particular claim.

Importance of Seeking Assistance from Immigration Services

Would you like to travel abroad? It is best to get help from one of the various immigration services you can find online or even in your local area. If you are interested in traveling to US, you need to read up online for the requirements before you begin filling out your paperwork. There are several forms that need to be filled out. If your move or immigration is work related, it is necessary to ensure that you have received all of the paperwork and visa that is needed to join the company.

Dual citizenship, immigration and secondary passport are important legal issues that need to be deal with someone knowledgeable about law. As these issues are country specific, the laws are always changing. As a layman, you may not be able to keep abreast of the situation, hiring a legal attorney or assistance from an immigration services is beneficial. An immigration attorney specializes in matters pertaining to dual citizenship, naturalization processes, dual passports, refugees and asylum seekers amidst other matters. They use their expertise in helping people enter in to the country of their desire or immigrate successfully.

One of the most sought after visas include H-1B that is a work visa, while the E-3 visa is acceptable for most countries. There is a fixed quota and highly competitive to qualify for it. It is also considered to be the first step to receive the green card. USA has some of the strictest laws on immigration and if you intend settling there, you do need to seek the advice of a lawyer. Most of the legislation and laws pertaining to immigrants are complicated and if you intend doing this alone, it might be detrimental to your travel plans. If you are seeking a student loan for studying in a University, they can guide you about applications, filling out the forms and other methods to help you be a candidate.

An expert immigration service or a lawyer will be able to provide you with the required legal assistance in ensuring your trip to US is memorable. They are skilled I addressing issues related to legal rights, obligations of foreigners in US and the duties associated as a temporary resident. Most of these services provide helps with immigration visas, petitions, visa waivers, citizenship issues, deportation, naturalization court proceedings and removal hearings.

There are innumerable skilled and experienced immigration services that advertise online apart from many immigration attorneys that are listed. The best aspect of hiring such a service is that they are apt at handling a partial immigration aspect or providing complete services helping you at every step. These are affordable services and you can just handle the amount of service that is needed instead of paying thousands of dollars for getting the whole process completed. Other areas of interest that are handled by immigration services include investment visas, second citizenship and diplomatic passport services.

Even after hiring these services, you need to do your bit of consolidating bank statements, ensuring all paperwork related to identity proof, documentations for verification of degrees, employment and other requirements are completed.