Carpet Cleaning Tips

Home cleaning is viewed as a craft of decorating your home. A lot of home cleaning tips have been coursing around; showing individuals powerful methods for cleaning their homes; one of the primary concerns with regards to keeping a spotless home is having a perfect carpet. Carpets come in a wide range of sorts and sizes. In any case, managed care and upkeep ought to be given to shield it from harm because of everyday utilize. Here is a portion of a couple of supportive tips on carpet cleaning:

The principal thing you have to consider is the kind of carpet that you have. Today, there are various sorts of carpets accessible available. Is your carpet woven, needlefelt, tufted or level weave? A particular cleaning procedure and additionally cleaning arrangement is required relying upon the sort of carpet you possess.

In the wake of distinguishing your kind of carpet, the following stride is to pick the correct cleaning answer for be utilized that will work best on the carpet sort you have. All things considered, you can’t simply clean your carpet with only the utilization of water. A cleaning arrangement is utilized to guarantee you have expelled all soil and tidy that have collected, particularly profound into the cushioning.

At the point when managing carpet recolors, the principal thing to do is to recognize what sort of stain is it? Is it a water-based or oil-based stain? Distinctive cleaning methodology is utilized relying upon the sort of stain on your carpet. Cleaning the stain promptly is an essential thing to remember. At the point when utilizing economically arranged stain arrangement take after the guidelines deliberately.

Home cleaning tips never neglect to specify carpet cleaning. A spotless carpet won’t simply guarantee a sound domain for you and your family yet will likewise keep it from pointless wear and tear. Taking after these supportive tips by Carpet cleaning Oakville won’t just spare you time, however, keep up the quality and guarantee your carpet remains in great condition in the years to come. metrochemdry.com

Despite the New Health Law, Retired people Still Need a Large Savings For Medical Costs

Some medical costs have been lowered due to the new health reform law but retired people still need a large amount in savings. A report by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) estimates that in order to be 90% sure of being able to cover medical expenses, people would need between $120, 000 and $211, 000 in savings. Women would need more since they live longer than men. The report is titled Funding Savings Needed for Health Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare.

Paul Fronstin, co-author, and director of EBRI’s Health Research and Education Program, said: “Because employers are continuing to scale back retiree health benefits, and policymakers may soon begin to address Medicare’s funding shortfall, more of the financial costs of health care will be shifted to Medicare beneficiaries in the future. ”

Estimates in the EBRI report have target levels of being sure to be able to cover out-of-pocket medical costs at 50%, 75% and 90%. The average male retiring this year at 65 will need between $65, 000 and $109, 000 in savings to be 50% sure of being able to cover medical costs. Women will need between $88, 000 and $146, 000 to be 50% sure. Men wanting to be 90% sure will need between $124, 000 and $211, 000, while women will need between $143, 000 and $242, 000.

The calculations only refer to those who are at least 65 when they retire. People retiring earlier will need more money in savings. The EBRI stresses this fact.

The new analysis by EBRI has savings estimates for single and married people. These savings estimates are based on Medicare and out-of-pocket costs, in order for medical care to be completely covered. The new estimates are updated from the 2008 estimates which were done before the new Health Law was enacted. The revision, also, includes Medicare Part D changes.

The most recent data for payment of expenses is from 2007. Medicare paid 64% of health care costs for beneficiaries while the out-of-pocket costs were about 14%. The other 12% were paid by public programs and private insurance.

There are ways for retirees to lower their 14% out-of0pocket costs. Since doctors depend on patients for their livelihood, many are willing to negotiate on procedures, tests and service costs. Find out what the reimbursement rate of your health insurance company is for a procedure and then ask your doctor to do it for that amount. You may not be able to get free health care but it can significantly cut your out-of-pocket costs. Even if your doctor turns down your request, ask every time you go. Persistence can pay off.

It is very challenging to determine what amount will be needed in savings to pay for medical costs in retirement. There are so many factors to take into consideration since no one knows how long they will live or what illnesses they will have. No one knows what medication they may be on either. Prescription drugs can become a huge expense.

Dallas Salisbury, co-author of the report and CEO of EBRI states, ” Many workers are generally unprepared for both health care expenses in retirement and retirement expenses. In fact, many individuals will need more money than the amounts cited in this report. “.

Finding the right Health Care Attorney For your Health Care Concerns

With the growing need for proper healthcare administration, it cannot be denied that the medical industry is expanding its services as well. Due to these, getting appropriate medical care can be quite difficult for many, especially with the existing laws that cover certain health concerns. The so called healthcare law encapsulate the statutes and regulations that regulate hospital and general medical administration. However, as these governing body is truly complex, the need for healthcare lawyers, who could provide answers to relating questions, has also been growing exponentially.

A health care attorney is capable of interpreting highly complex regulations and statutes. This type of lawyer advises hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, physicians, insurer, other providers, and even patients regarding matters that are under the governing body of the law. This means that they are highly qualified to provide medical professionals and patients alike with information about medico-legal concepts that are hard to understand and synthesize. Licensing, reimbursements, malpractice litigation, medical insurance, risk managements, and general corporate management issues are just some of the many medical matters that can be properly addressed by lawyers.

Because of the wide scope of the law, providers and patients alike definitely need to employ the service of a specialized attorney so as to receive appropriate legal counseling that could address their issues. For health care practitioners, healthcare lawyers are helpful in furnishing information as well as answering questions about the legalities of different matters including bioethical issues like Medicare and Medicaid compliance, assisted reproduction and introduction of new technologies in accordance to patient privacy laws. In addition, they collaborate with hospitals and other institutions and organizations for litigation such as defense for medical malpractice, commercial and labor disputes, antitrust and abuse litigation, and fraud. As for patients, lawyers can assist them with their private insurance policies, estate planning as well as their patient rights.

These lawyers have a wide clientele base. In fact, aside from their physician and patient clients they also work for health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and other known and registered health organizations. Similarly, they also legally stand in behalf of ambulatory surgical centers, dental practices, laboratories as well as nurses, chiropractors, dentists and podiatrists. Seemingly, this client base is a clear evidence of the growing demand for these kind of lawyers.

As with any law practice, strong logic and analysis are two important characteristics that a practitioner must exude. When it comes to practicing health law, it is essential to have strong affinity towards the policies and legal process of the health care system. Hence, if you are looking for an attorney who would address your health care concerns, make sure that the person you would employ has acquired a Juris doctorate degree, has a license and had passed the Bar examination. You have to consider all these things for you to ensure that you would be getting appropriate legal counsel.

There are myriads of law firms today that offer specialize in healthcare law and offer the services of these types of lawyers. However, before you contact them, make sure that you do extensive background check about your prospective law firms or health care lawyers. One of the best things you can do is to ask your fellow medical professionals or patients who have already tried the services of health care lawyers, so that they would be able to make recommendations that could help you with your decision. Although you may not be experiencing any issues concerning your health care practice or needs, it is always best to have a legal counsel to prepare you in case problems arise in the future.

The health system has complex laws that are not fully understood by most medical practitioners and patients alike. Because of this, employing the services of a health care attorney is therefore imperative in order to have better grasp on these governing laws. Lawyers who specialize in this kind of laws can provide medical practitioners and organizations with medico-legal counsels that are essential for the improvement of providing medical services to people.

New York’s Good Samaritan Law – A good Deed Goes Unpunished

The other day, a client was telling me a story. While trying to describe somebody’s personality, he said this:

“She’s the type of person that will find fault in everything you do. If you push her off the tracks just seconds before she is about to be struck by a speeding locomotive, she’ll sue you for bruising her leg and soiling her clothes. ”

And that reminded me of New York’s Good Samaritan law, today’s topic.

Common Law: No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

Generally speaking, there is no duty to come to the aid of somebody that has been in an accident and in need of emergency medical assistance. However, not long ago, if you attempted to render medical assistance to somebody and botched the rescue, chances were you would be sued. Therefore, educated bystanders wouldn’t dare attempt a rescue.

Since the common law discouraged bystanders from attempting to render medical assistance to those in need, the legislature, recognizing this result was both unacceptable and undesirable, enacted in 2000 what is generally referred to as the Good Samaritan law.

Effect of the Law

New York’s Good Samaritan law carves out specific circumstances when an individual shall not be held liable for ordinary negligence in attempting to render medical assistance. Instead, they will only be held liable in cases of gross negligence.

Gross Negligence

Simply put, negligence is a failure to exercise ordinary care. Gross negligence means a failure to use even slight care, or is conduct that is so careless as to show complete disregard for the rights and safety of others.

When it Applies

The law isn’t found in one centralized part, but rather integrated into various provisions of the NY Public Health Law and the NY Education Law.

Importantly, New York’s Good Samaritan law is limited to medical treatment or assistance. The heart of the law is found in Pub. Health Law §3000-a, which provides in part:

Any person who voluntarily and without expectation of monetary compensation renders first aid or emergency treatment at the scene of an accident or other emergency outside a hospital, doctor’s office or any other place having proper and necessary medical equipment, to a person who is unconscious, ill, or injured, shall not be liable for damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by such person or for damages for the death of such person alleged to have occurred by reason of an act or omission in the rendering of such emergency treatment unless it is established that such injuries were or such death was caused by gross negligence on the part of such person.

Voluntary Act; No Expectation of Monetary Compensation

An important theme here is that the person act both voluntarily, and without the expectation of monetary compensation. This is significant because the protection extends to dentists (Educ. on Law §661[6]), physicians (Educ. Law §6527[2]), nurses (Educ. Law §6909[1]), physicians assistants (Educ. Law §6547) and physical therapists (Educ. Law §6737), provided they are not in a place having proper and necessary medical equipment, and are not rendering their professional or licensed services in the ordinary course of their practices.

Automated External Defibrillator (AED) and Epinephrine Auto-Injector (Epi-pen) Devices

The law is somewhat different, however, for emergency health care providers, or those persons or entities that purchase or make available Automated External Defibrillator (AED) devices, or Epinephrine Auto-Injector devices. In those cases, the emergency health care provider, person or entity, shall not be held liable for the use of that equipment if a person voluntarily and without expectation of monetary compensation renders first aid or emergency medical treatment, and shall also not be held liable for the use of defectively manufactured equipment.

However, the law expressly states it shall not limit claims against the emergency health care provider, person or entity that purchased or made available that equipment from its own negligence, gross negligence or intentional misconduct. Pub. Health Law §3000-a(2). See, also, Pub. Health Law §3000-b (Automated External Defibrillators) and Pub. Health Law §3000-c (Epinephrine Auto-Injector).

The health Reform Law Provides New Career Opportunities in the Health Services Sector!

The health Reform Law signed March 23, 2010, will increase demand in all areas of health care in America. The intent of the law was to create a virtual universal health care system in america that could accommodate all the people. Few people are able to pay cash for medical services; most of us rely on health insurance to cover our medical expenses. Prior to the signing of the Health Reform bill, health care insurance hasn’t been widely available to all Americans and this has caused many of us to put off early treatment until the ailment assumes critical proportions. When it does, we must then go to emergency rooms, with our then advanced disease. The emergency room is the most expensive type of medical care, and one of the chief reasons Americans are spending a stunning $2 trillion a year on medical services. Making health insurance accessible and affordable to all Americans is the answer to this problem.

Being insured, people will be able to seek early treatment, and preventative medicine can thus curtail the more expensive procedures that are the root cause of the uncontrolled growth of medical care cost. The law has already taken effect and the ramifications, in terms of numbers of patients, are about to descend on a health services industry that is ill prepared to handle the increased volume.

Currently, health services in the U. S. are barely able to keep up with the 150 million employer-insured and the 40 million elderly citizens receiving Medicare. By 2019, the ranks of the employer-insured are expected to increase by 9 million, and Medicare will take on another 12 million people. Exchanges, a vehicle that will provide low cost insurance to small businesses and individuals, will add an additional 25 million to the rolls. From 2010 to 2019, approximately 46 million new people will be added to the health care load. Does our current health services industry have what’s needed to accommodate this relatively sudden growth?

Most of the burden of this increase will fall on the primary care component of the health services industry. According to the Academy of Family Physicians, by 2020, the demand will far outweigh the supply of these professionals. 40, 000 new primary care professionals is what the demand will require. At that time, we’ll have a situation in which nearly everyone can afford medical treatment, while yet fewer professionals are available to provide it.

To meet the expected increase in medical services demands, the new Health Law has allocated billions to the education of new health care professionals. Even if they were to get started immediately, most would not be fully trained until from four to six years hence. To get the ball rolling, the law has provided funds for education in the health services field, has made scholarships and grants available, and is set to support professionals in whatever continuing studies they may need to handle the new demand. Demand over supply will also inevitably increase monetary compensation for available health care professionals. For those considering health services as a career, a wide open field awaits them with all the help they will need to establish their new careers.

Attention is also being focused on how and where health care may be delivered. The law is allocating $11 billion for the creation of new health centers in our communities. Work is underway to promote nurse-operated clinics. Nurse practitioners and physician’s assistants will take on new roles, having increased responsibilities. Expect to see new and different medical facilities working in coordination, in order to optimize the use of health service personnel.

Thanks to the Health Reform Law, the health services industry is about to become the most promising career path available. If you’re considering what career choice to follow, now is the time to look into the health services industry. Now is your chance to be in demand, for a lifetime!

8 Laws Of Health That will Lead To Happiness – Prosperity & Long life

This country, the US, was founded on freedom. Our creator gave us the freedom to choose our own will as well, but with that freedom comes great responsibility. You and I are free to own and drive a car, own a fire arm, free to shop where ever we wish etc… but when we abuse those things, like drive 103 miles an hour down the road, use the fire arm to threaten or kill someone, steal the merchandise from the stores… our freedom is revoked by those in charge of carrying out the law, and rightfully so. You wouldn’t have freedom to live very peacefully if your neighbor was a known thief, sex offender or murderer, would you? How free do you feel with drunk drivers on the same road as you?

Laws are in place to give us freedom, not restrict us. Besides the 10 laws or commandments given to us by God in Exodus chapter 20 to give us freedom from harm, He also gave us 8 health laws so that we could be free from disease and free to live a productive, happy, healthy, long life. The difference between the law of man and the health laws of God is, there aren’t any policemen that come and arrest us for breaking those health laws, we simply forfeit our good health.

Before the flood, man lived to be over 900 years old. Methuselah lived to be 969, Gen. 5: 27 and if you study the people in those days, they didn’t die of the chronic degenerative diseases like we are today. When their life was over, they just went to sleep, if they weren’t killed in battle first.

Now you and I aren’t going to live to be 969 years old, no matter what we do. Besides, living longer isn’t the real objective. We don’t know when our time is up anyway. The real objective here is to find the true, achievable ways to improve our health so that we can live out our days, however many that may be, more abundantly.

When you bought your automobile, an owners manual came with it. That owner’s manual gives you specific instructions as to what fuel, oil, parts etc… to use in order for that machine to run at peak performance for many years to come. Now you wouldn’t put water in the fuel tank or soda pop in place of the oil would you? Of course you wouldn’t.

So who sold you on the idea of putting poison in your body… long term on top of that?

Did that person create your body? Did they tell you it would heal your disease? No, they didn’t because medicines don’t heal, your body does the healing. Just go to the doctor with a broken bone and ask him to heal you. All he can do is give you some pain killers, set your arm in a cast and send you home. Your body does the healing, if it has what it needs in the way of nutrition and is not too broken down by disease. In that case, you have some restoration work to do, (quit putting water in the gas tank and soda pop in the oil tank… start following the 8 laws of health) not just take more medications. That is the way we were created in the beginning and nothing has changed, even though there are those in the pharmaceutical industry who would, out of greed, have you believe otherwise. Don’t get the wrong idea, our creator also gave us the gift of understanding about the body and how to fix it in the event of a accident. I am grateful for all the wonderful hard working doctors, but…

Based on the Bible and my studies, I believe we were not meant to live on medications and I think common sense would tell you that as well. All pharmaceutical medications are poisons. If you don’t believe me, just try taking too many and see what happens. No, don’t go do that, because you know that you will get very sick or die if you do. Now that doesn’t mean that using medication to save your life isn’t in order from time to time, it simply means we are not designed to put those medications or poisons into our system long term.

Symptoms are the fire alarms that our body gives us to wake us up and tell us that there is a fire on board.

If your fire alarm went off in your bed room one night, you wouldn’t just reach up and yank out the batteries and go back to sleep, but that is exactly what we do when we go to the doctor, get the medicine and continue on as usual without further investigation or change. Our response to those symptoms should be to not only call the fire department (the doctor), but get the fire extinguisher and investigate thoroughly what caused the fire so that it won’t happen again.

You and I have the freedom to choose how we will live and what we will put on and into our bodies, but with that freedom comes blessings or curses. May you choose wisely.

Negotiating Technology Contracts in Health care

Technology spending for hardware, software and consulting services accounts for a significant portion of most health care providers budgets today, especially since the Obama Stimulus Plan and HITECH Act are incentivizing providers to implement electronic health records. In a perfect world, technology works perfectly, improves efficiency and the quality of care and makes life easier for the provider. However, the real world is not perfect and things can, and do, go wrong with technology products and services after you purchase and/or license them from third party vendors. Technology contracts generally are written by the vendors and consultants. Unfortunately, many technology contracts fall short of giving providers adequate protection and often contain hidden pitfalls and costs. Despite this fact, many providers never give these contracts to experienced health lawyers to help them negotiate better terms and protections for their high-tech investments BEFORE signing. This is a potentially costly practice. Every health care provider should be concerned with at least the following FOUR KEY ISSUES, which should be addressed in any technology contract:

Warranties and Limitations of Liability: Despite elaborate sales presentations, technology contracts typically disclaim most, if not all, warranties and limit the liability of vendors to only refunding all or part of the purchase or license price paid for the technology. Such refunds are inadequate to protect the average provider when problems arise. A technology vendor should be required to give a written warranty in the contract that its product will perform in accordance with documented standards and for a reasonable period of time. At a minimum, this time period should be long enough for the provider to evaluate the technology in its operations. A better solution is to require a warranty for the useful life of the technology, or as long as there is a support and maintenance service agreement in place. A vendor also should not be allowed contractually to limit its liability on default only to return of the purchase price. If a provider suffers actual damages caused by the technology, the vendor should be required, in writing, to stand behind its product and services and reimburse such damages. A reasonable compromise is to require the vendor at least to tender the limits of its insurance coverage, which creates minimal additional risk to the vendor while better protecting the provider.

Payments & Performance: A provider should not agree to pay the full purchase price up front, as is often a contract requirement, leaving the vendor with little incentive to complete its responsibilities. The parties should mutually agree in advance upon a project timetable with milestone targets for delivery and implementation of the technology. Payments should be made in installments conditioned upon reaching the targets. In addition, providers should build in testing rights, in order to evaluate whether the technology is performing as promised. The provider always should have the final say in whether a test provides a successful outcome and whether the final payment should be made to the vendor.

Support and Maintenance: A technology hardware purchase or software license is only as good as the support and maintenance that goes along with it. The vendor should be willing to provide support for at least a defined useful life of the technology. Several questions should be answered in a written support agreement. Are updates or upgrades provided without additional charge? Will the vendor perform on-site or off-site support and maintenance? Will the provider pay a monthly fee plus an hourly charge or is there only an hourly charge? Does the hourly charge differ depending on when or what level of support is needed? Do the charges increase over the term of the support agreement? What is the vendor agreeing to support? Will changes made to the technology by the provider automatically terminate the warranty or support obligations? Unless the contract is specific regarding essential issues, a provider may find itself paying for less or different support and/or maintenance services than needed or expected.

Confidentiality: Confidentiality of patient health information is a critical issue. Federal HIPAA law has a variety of privacy and security rules providers and their business associates must follow. In addition, some states, including Florida, have enacted legislation that requires entities that conduct business in the state and which maintain computerized data that contains personal information to provide notice to any resident if there is a breach of security. A technology contract should specify if the vendor will have access to any of the confidential patient information. A health care provider must require the vendor and its employees to maintain the confidentiality of such information under federal and many state laws. The technology contract also should expressly protect the confidentiality of provider trade secrets and other proprietary information to which a vendor or consultant may have access.

Although technology contracts may appear intimidating, as they frequently are presented by vendors in small print and columned format, leading providers to believe they are non-negotiable forms, this is not the case in most instances. Investing the time and resources to have a health law attorney experienced in technology contracting review and help to negotiate contracts for hardware purchases, software licenses, maintenance and support, as well as technology consulting services, can save providers significant expense, disappointment and damages should the technology products or services not perform as promised.

Sandra P. Greenblatt, Esq. is a Florida Bar Board Certified Health Lawyer with more than 20 years experience representing health care providers, payors and businesses in their regulatory, transactional and technology matters. She is President of the health law firm of Sandra Greenblatt, P. A., located in Miami, Florida. You may contact Mrs. Greenblatt through her website, http://FLhealthlawyer.com For a more in depth discussion of technology contracting issues, see Ms. Greenblatt’s Chapter on the topic in the 2009 “Health Law Handbook” available through the Florida Bar Health Law Section, or contact her firm to consult on your specific legal issues. This article is copyrighted by Sandra Greenblatt, P. A. and may not be reproduced without the author’s prior written consent.

New Mental Health Law Affects Benefits

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) signed by George Bush as part of the financial rescue package in October 2008 will take effect 1/1/2010. This law greatly affects all mental health professionals and billers.

The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Act of 2008 made changes to the Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) of 1996 which allowed for too many restrictions to benefits. The problem with the 1996 act was that it allowed for too many loopholes and still encouraged discrimination against benefits for those seeking treatment with psychotherapists.

The 2008 Act closed up some of those loopholes. For example, the 1996 MHPA allowed employers to limit the number of visits for treatment whereas the 2008 Act states that mental health benefits can be no more restrictive than medical benefits.

The new law attempts to make coverage for these benefits equivalent to medical service benefits. If a health plan allows for out of network benefits for medical services, they must now allow the same out of network benefits for mental health treatment.

The major provisions for the new law are:

· Does not allow employers or insurers to place stricter limits on mental health services than they have on medical benefits. This means not allowing higher co-pays, deductibles or limiting the number of visits.
· If a policy allows for out of network benefits for medical benefits it must allow the same out of network benefits for mental health.
· If a policy allows benefits for substance abuse, both in and out of network, the limitations cannot be more restrictive than they are for medical benefits.
· Any state parity measures are left in place.

We currently see many policies paying only 50% of the allowable with the patient responsible for the remaining 50%. Under the new law this will no longer be possible unless the health plan pays only 50% of the allowable for medical benefits as well as psychotherapy visits. We have even seen health plans that pay only $10 per visit for psychotherapy.

The Act unfortunately does not cover all insured people. Employers with 50 or less employees are exempt from this Act. Also, the law does not require health insurance plans to cover mental health and substance abuse disorders. It only applies to plans that have coverage for mental disorders or substance abuse.

What does this mean to psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists? These providers will not see as much discrimination for their services. Patients will not be penalized for seeing treatment and will receive equal benefits.

It’s not a perfect solution and doesn’t cover everyone, but it is definitely a step toward equal benefits.

The 25 Biggest Mistakes Dentists Make After Being Notified of a Department of Health Complaint

The investigation of a complaint which could lead to the revocation of a dentist’s license to practice and the assessment of tens of thousands of dollars in fines, usually starts with a simple letter from the Department of Health (DOH). This is a very serious legal matter and it should be treated as such by the dentist who receives it. Yet, in many cases, attorneys are consulted by dentists after the entire investigation is over, and they have attempted to represent themselves throughout the case. Often, the mistakes that have been made severely compromise an attorney’s ability to achieve a favorable result for the dentist.

These are the 25 biggest mistakes we see in the dentist cases we are called upon to defend after a DOH investigation has been initiated:

1. Failing to keep a current, valid address on file with the DOH (as required by law), which may seriously delay the receipt of the Uniform Complaint (notice of investigation), letters, and other important correspondence related to the investigation.

2. Contacting the DOH investigator and providing him/her an oral statement or oral interview. (Note: There is no legal requirement to do this. )#)

3. Making a written statement in response to the “invitation” extended by the DOH investigator to do so. (Note: There is no legal requirement to do this. )#)

4. Failing to carefully review the complaint to make sure it has been sent to the correct dentist. (Note: Check name and license number).

5. Failing to ascertain whether or not the investigation is on the “Fast Track” which may then result in an emergency suspension order (ESO) suspending the dentist’s license until all proceedings are concluded. (Note: This will usually be the case if there are allegations regarding drug abuse, alcohol abuse, sexual contact with a patient, mental health issues, or failure to comply with PRN instructions. )#)

6. Providing a copy of the dentist’s curriculum vitae (CV) or resume to the investigator because the investigator requested them to do so. (Note: There is no legal requirement to do this. )#)

7. Believing that if they “just explain it, ” the investigation will be closed and the case dropped.

8. Failing to submit a timely objection to a DOH subpoena when there are valid grounds to do so.

9. Failing to forward a complete copy of the patient dental record when subpoenaed by the DOH investigator as part of the investigation, when no objection is going to be filed.

10. Delegating the task of providing a complete copy of the patient dental record to office staff, resulting in an incomplete or partial copy being provided.

11. Failing to keep an exact copy of any dental records, documents, letters or statements provided to the investigator.

12. Believing that the investigator has knowledge or experience in health care matters or procedures being investigated.

13. Believing that the investigator is merely attempting to ascertain the truth of the matter and this will result in the matter being dismissed.

14. Failing to check to see if their medical malpractice insurance carrier will pay the legal fees to defend them in this investigation.

15. Talking to DOH investigators, staff or attorneys, in the mistaken belief that they are capable of doing so without providing information that can and will be used against them.

16. Believing that because they haven’t heard anything for six months or more the matter has “gone away. ” The matter does not ever just go away.

17. Failing to submit a written request to the investigator at the beginning of the investigation for a copy of the complete investigation report and file and then following up with additional requests until it is received.

18. Failing to wisely use the time while the investigation is proceeding to interview witnesses, obtain witness statements, conduct research, obtain experts, and perform other tasks that may assist defending the case.

19. Failing to exercise the right of submitting documents, statements, and expert opinions to rebut the findings made in the investigation report before the case is submitted to the Probable Cause Panel of your licensing board for a decision.

20. Taking legal advice from their colleagues regarding what they should do (or not do) in defending themselves in the investigation.

21. Retaining “consultants” or other non-lawyer personnel to represent them.

22. Believing that the case is indefensible so there is no reason to even try to have it dismissed by the Probable Cause Panel.

23. Attempting to defend themselves.

24. Believing that because they know someone with the Department of Health or a state legislator, that influence can be exerted to have the case dismissed.

25. Failing to immediately retain the services of a health care attorney who is experienced in such matters to represent them, to communicate with the DOH investigator for them, and to prepare and submit materials to the Probable Cause Panel.

Bonus Point: 26. Communicating with the Department of Health about the pending case.

Not every case will require submission of materials to the Probable Cause Panel after the investigation is received and reviewed. There will be a few where the allegations made are not “legally sufficient” and do not constitute an offense for which the dentist may be disciplined.

In other cases, an experienced health care attorney may be successful in obtaining a commitment from the DOH attorney to recommend a dismissal to the Probable Cause Panel. In other cases (usually the most serious ones), for tactical reasons, the experienced health care attorney may recommend that you waive your right to have the case submitted to the Probable Cause Panel and that you proceed directly to an administrative hearing. The key to a successful outcome in all of these cases is to obtain the assistance of a health care lawyer who is experienced in appearing before the Board of Medicine in such cases and does so on a regular basis.

Ignorance of Nutrition Laws Are No Excuse

If you’re driving down the street in a 25 miles per hour zone at a rate of 40 miles per hour then it is safe to say that you are breaking the law. Does it matter if you knew or not that you were breaking the law? In a court of law you will be punished the same way which is why your actions would more than likely result in a ticket if you were detained by a traffic-enforcement officer.

This illustration was used to help you understand that nature has laws that are in the best interest of man to follow. When you take inorganic substances and put them into the organic vessel known as your body then you are in direct violation of several health laws. It does not matter if you know that you are in violation of certain laws or not, the outcome will remain the same. If you partake in activities such as smoking cigarettes then it’s a great chance that you will have some form of lung, throat or chest ailment at some point over the course of your life. It’s not guaranteed but the probability increases with each insalubrious act.

Here is where people are confused. People mistake a person “being good” with a person following natural health laws. I’m sure you know people who were the nicest people but yet they were plagued with diseases that eventually claimed their lives or the quality of their life. Then you have those who are not known as “good people” but they have youthful appearances and are considered healthy by normal standards because they consume loads of nutrient rich foods, herbs and other vitamins.

It is important for you to glean my next sentence. You can be the nicest person on earth and be known for doing every good deed known to mankind but if you are not eating and living in accordance with nature you will be sick. There is no other way to say it. Eating fried foods, refined foods and sugar laced products will prove to be harmful to your state of health. You must approach the laws of nature just as you would the law of electricity or the law of gravity. We know not for certain how these laws function but they have a great impact on all life forms that exist today so we must respect them. If you do not believe in gravity simply jump out of an airplane with no parachute and let me know how that turns out. If you do not believe in the law of electricity just hang on to a live wire that has fallen during a rainstorm. You will probably cease to exist if you are so brazen as to carry out these acts.

If you have an option to be edified or not regarding the laws of nature and health then it is better to be edified. When you know something you are well equipped to make an educated decision. For example, if you do not know that meat and milk both help cause osteoporosis then you will continue to eat meat and be surprised when you are diagnosed with arthritic bones and osteoporosis. Study and gain knowledge but above all gain understanding on nutrition because ignorance of health laws will not keep disease from showing up at your doorstep.