Why a Denver DUI Attorney is Important When You Have a DUI Case

Drinking and driving in Colorado can be a dangerous prospect for everyone involved. The best way to avoid a DUI in Denver is to avoid drinking and driving at all possible. Even so, everyone makes mistakes at one point or another. If you have incurred a DUI charge, then it’s important to hire the right Denver DUI attorney to represent you. Still, it’s also important to understand a few of the intricacies of Colorado DUI law so that you can better understand what you’re up against.

Car Bumping a Post

Colorado DUI Law 101

Like most other places in the United States, a DUI case means that the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol. In most cases, the arresting officer will determine the driver’s level of drunkenness by administering one or more tests designed to gauge the blood-alcohol content (BAC) in the driver’s system. These tests include:

Field sobriety tests – a series of physical and mental examinations designed to allow the officer to visually observe one’s level of drunkenness.
Breathalyzer test – a test that determines BAC from particles in one’s breath.
Blood test – a test in which blood is drawn to determine a more accurate BAC level (usually administered back at police station).
Urinalysis – a test that uses one’s urine to determine BAC levels (usually administered back at police station).

In Colorado, officers are allowed to enforce two separate penalties depending on the driver’s BAC. These two charges are DWAI (driving while ability impaired) and the standard DUI (driving under the influence. The BAC levels needed to trigger either of these charges are as follows:

DWAI – between 0.05% and 0.08% BAC
DUI – 0.08% BAC or higher

If you have a BAC level that is lower than 0.05%, then you likely will not be charged with a DWAI or DUI unless you were driving erratically. There are some instances in which police can make independent determinations about the driver’s ability to safely remain on the road.

The Value of a Denver DUI Attorney

Armed with all of this information, you may feel as if it is unimportant to ask for additional legal representation. But, DUI lawyers have the unique ability to navigate the judicial system with aplomb. They understand courtroom procedures, the full extent of the law, and other intricacies that you can only acquire through experience. They also understand how to lessen penalties or even eliminate the charges altogether.

Without a good Denver DUI attorney, you may be subjected to the full force of the Colorado judicial system and be left helpless with your DUI defense. The penalties for a single DUI offense can get you as much as:

1 year in jail
$1,000 in fines
9-month license suspension
Other court costs and fees

The penalties only increase depending on the number of times you’ve already been convicted for a DUI or DWAI. It’s certainly within your best interest to call on the power of a qualified attorney to help you win your DUI-related legal battles in Denver. No one wants to experience the full brunt of what a DUI penalty can drop on them, and it’s important to have a qualified legal professional on your team that can mitigate the damage.

Personal Injury Lawyer, Markham- A Lawyer in Times of Need

No individual in the normal course of events ever has an attorney on call. Majority of the individuals are law abiding citizens who do not feel the need for a lawyer. But there are instances when he becomes a victim of some crime which results in injury to him. What are such instances that call for a personal injury lawyer!

  • Occurrence of Accidents

Motor vehicle accidents account for maximum number of accidents each year. These are besides the public transportation accidents connected with metro cars, buses, trains or the subway. With rapid advancements in technology, moving from one place to another has become very easy; at the same time diversions too have increased. A truck driver may not see the individual crossing the street. The cabdriver may not be able to apply brakes instantaneously. The rails could have become slippery. There are innumerable chances of the individual getting caught in one or the many other accident possibilities.

  • Exposure to Toxic fumes

People are exposed to toxic fumes in everyday life without being aware of it. There are so many cases shown on television about the adverse effects caused due to asbestos exposure. Toxins are present in air, water and soil and in just about everything that an individual does in his daily life. Pesticides are not washed off from the vegetables and fruits that are ingested. Effects of continuous exposure to such toxins manifest only after a while.

There are chances of residential apartments being constructed with toxic materials. Lead paint may have been used at workplaces of individuals. Sometimes, an accident at workplace can expose the individual to toxic fumes for no fault of his. And then there is no escape for him from the resulting injuries.

At such times, there is a need for the individual to find a personal injury lawyer. He is the one who guides the aggrieved individual to obtain justice. He is an expert in dumping laws, building codes and much other legislation which protect the safety of the individual and his loved ones.

In this context, the personal injury lawyer in Markham lives up to the good reputation of personal injury lawyers and ensures bringing the culprits to task and getting fair compensation to his clients.

5 Most Dangerous Cities For Pedestrians

A survey of the world’s most dangerous cities in the world for pedestrians has thrown up very remarkable results. Bustling Tokyo does not feature in the list of the most dangerous cities, nor does chaotic Mumbai, or for that matter the sprawling metropolises of Ankara and Paris. The five most dangerous cities in the world for pedestrians are not in Asia or Europe but the US. Moreover, what’s more surprising, four of the five are from the state of Florida alone.

The Pedestrian Danger Index (PDI)

Experts use what is called the Pedestrian Danger Index, to determine which cities are the most dangerous for pedestrians. The higher the PDI of a city, the more dangerous it is. This index takes into account all the risks and harms that the average pedestrian faces, including the number of deaths per hundred thousand pedestrians. The average PDI in the US is somewhere in the 50s. While Pedestrian Danger Indices of the most dangerous cities in the world for pedestrians hover around four times the national average.

A National Disaster

More pedestrians are killed in the US by accidents every year than people killed in natural disasters. In fact, more than 45,000 pedestrians were killed in the US between 2003 and 2012. So what makes the cities of the US the most dangerous in the world? Let’s find out.

Here at the five most dangerous cities in the world for pedestrians.

1. Orlando, Florida

2. Tampa. Florida

3. Jacksonville, Florida

4. Miami- Fort Lauderdale, Florida

5. Memphis, Tennessee

Yes, these cities from the Sun Belt beat the rest of the world as well as the country for being the most dangerous cities for pedestrians. These Sun Belt cities with vast open spaces, amazingly auto friendly roads, are considered to be paradise for its residents. Not so for their unfortunate pedestrians though.

Florida: the Capital of Pedestrian Accidents

Four of the five most dangerous cities for pedestrians are in the city of Florida! What makes Florida, the most dangerous for pedestrian traffic? Why are its walkers most at risk?

Older Pedestrians, Older Drivers

As we grow old, our reflexes slow down. Moreover, accidents happen more often. Florida is a state that many Americans like to retire to. As a result, its cities contain older people. Naturally, with the elderly crossing the streets more often and driving more often, the chances of pedestrian accidents rise.

More Pedestrians, Fewer Accidents

Cities which have more pedestrian traffic, where more and more people walk the sidewalks, have less pedestrian accidents and low PDI. All the cities that have appeared in the list have remarkably few people walking its pavements. Hence, the city takes fewer precautions to ensure that its pedestrians are safe.

Congested Cities are Better

Highly congested areas have lower average speeds for vehicular traffic. While sprawling urban centers have cars driving at quite a high speed gives rise to more accidents for pedestrians.

Slower Means Safer

Roads where the speed limits are high tend to have more pedestrian accidents. While roads where the speed limits are low are more likely to have fewer accidents. Most of the pedestrian deaths take place on arterial road. Roads designed to move vehicular traffic along at extremely high speeds.

Newer Cities Shown to be More Dangerous

All five cities have come up since the Second World War. Older American cities like New York, Boston and Chicago are much safer, and are, in fact, among the safest in the United States. Their Pedestrian Danger Indices are one-tenth of that of the cities of Florida.

The older cities were designed and developed long before the motor vehicle became the dominant form of transportation. So the DNA of their design includes more consideration for the pedestrians. The newer American cities to be more car friendly than pedestrian friendly.

Solutions: Late and Few

Governments both local and national are slowly waking up to the gravity of this national disaster. Moves are being made to make these Sun Belt cities safer for pedestrians. The attempts are twofold. The first being in building and designing ‘complete street systems’. These are streets that pay attention to other forms of traffic than vehicular, so more bike lanes, bus lanes, crosswalks and better pavements. Another attempt is to slow down the speed at which traffic is allowed to travel within the cities.

The author, Edrick Hypolite, is a resident of Orlando who was surprised to find his home city topping this list of statistics. To help protect himself, he learned in advance the best attornies in the area, and is confident that if he’s ever injured he can turn to the Law Office of David Heil. You can learn more about Edrick on Google+.

Cycling Injury Claims Advice Made Simple

Victims of accidents often feel guilty about speaking to an attorney or even considering making cycling injury claims. It is important to know that you are entitled to make a claim and have every right to protect yourself and your loved ones by doing so. It is very important to know what to do and the steps to take if you are ever involved in a bicycle accident. Get a solicitor early to improve your chances for a successful claim.

The list of things that will cost money to address is long and will continue to grow. It includes damaged equipment and medical bills. In an accident the responsible party has the responsibility or the liability to restore and compensate the victim for damages suffered. It is therefore important to never admit or accept liability at the scene of the accident. That can be discussed later when you have sought legal advice and representation.

Although cyclists account for a significant portion of road users, a lot of them are without insurance. This makes this set of road users more vulnerable than motorists. This is not always the case as some cyclists have insurance, including third party coverage. It is important to provide the other party with this information if you are ever involved in an accident.

Many cyclists and motorists think that cyclists who do not have insurance do not have any recourse or rights in the event of an accident. This is definitely not so. It might take a little longer and a little more effort, but you are also entitled to full restitution and compensation after an accident. This is why it is important to secure the services of a qualified cycling solicitor, who can help you to file a claim.

The cost of legal representation can be a major deterrent for some cyclists. They worry about the expensive process of hiring a lawyer. Fortunately a lot of law firms now offer “no win no fee” services that allows clients to obtain the legal help they need without any upfront costs. How it works, is the lawyer takes on the case and assumes all the risk. If they do not win, then there is no money to be paid and you do not owe the law firm any money.

This is a win, win situation for victims who are out of pocket due to an accident that needs help fast. It is also a guarantee that can provide victims with peace of mind. The solicitor has everything to lose. It is therefore critical that they do a good job representing the client in order to win a judgement and collect a fee. The higher the judgement is, the better it is for the solicitor, as their fee usually represents a percentage of the award or judgement.

The lack of funds is no longer a reason not to file cycling injury claims. You can visit Carry on Cycling to hire an experienced bike solicitor.

Do you want to know, “How to find Divorce Service in Cambridge”

Arising with regard to unmarried couples, married couples, pre and post nuptial agreements, civil partnerships, cohabitation, divorce, legal separation and many such things, the term family law comprises of all this and deals with various aspects of such legal issues. This branch of law also deals with any legal issues relating to children. Besides adoption and financial provision for the kids, these range from contact cases to visitation rights.

For a divorce services available in Cambridge, no two cases can ever be the same. To those who focused on people and those who have empathy towards others, this profession is well suited. Often the clients who are suffering from very tough times are those who seek assistance from family lawyers as they are very emotional at the time and may not be thinking clearly. Listening to and many times giving support to the clients in their difficult time is the daily job of a family solicitor. However, since family law is inclusive of very emotive subjects and areas it is very important that anyone who is planning on entering the field knows that they need to have the best astute legal skills.

hlt-j13-14148.imae2_

It is important for the client to choose a divorce service in Cambridge who is sensitive to their plight. It is not the client’s responsibility to worry about the legal processes as the family solicitors specialize in this field and are always non-judgmental and fair. If you want to know how to find Divorce Service in Cambridge, you need to take the help of the internet. You can find a lot of information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_separation.

The field has three main areas comprising of finance, divorce and children. These include finance disputes between couples, splits and child custody. As far as upbringing of the children is concerned, the lawyers provide assistance with that as well. Estranged parents/grandparents seek help from family lawyers to find out their rights to visit their children/grandchildren. Many people are often refused visitation rights to their grandchildren. The figures add up to about 1,000,000 in the United Kingdom. Deep rooted disputes between couples are also handled by the family lawyers.

Thus is it apparent that this area of law is sought by a large cross-section of clients, since it is obvious that most of us will have a family at one point or another in our lives. From bankers to builders, everyone at some point requires the services of a family solicitor. To know more about How to find Divorce Service In Cambridge please visit the website.

If you have been experiencing any type of hardship or problem as far as your family or marriage is concerned, you have many family lawyers and qualified attorneys to choose from in Cambridge. If you are in trouble with your partner, the law firms will be more than happy to help you and impart good legal advice.

The 5 Craziest State Gun Laws in America

We Americans love our weapons, and what’s not to love? It’s incredibly fun to go shooting at a range or out hunting. Some researchers have found that shooting guns can actually make you a happier and more well balanced person. This is exactly why there are some fiercely protective weapons laws. On the other end of the spectrum, though, you have gun control advocates who, pardon the choice of words, gun for more control of our lust for weapons. As a result, you get some of the wildest and most inane state gun laws. Here are the five craziest state gun laws in America.

  1. A 16 year old in Vermont can carry a concealed weapon without a permit and without parental permission. Many states allow kids under the age of eighteen to own weapons, but with a parent’s consent. In Vermont, however, a child under the age of eighteen can use a rifle or handgun without getting a parent’s permission.
  2. In Georgia it is legal to bring a gun to work, and your boss can’t do anything about it. Many states have statutes in place that forbid employers from asking if their employees own weapons. In Georgia, however, employees can bring a concealed weapon to work, and the employer can be sued if he asks the employee to take the gun home or to not come back to work. Considering this is legal, you could probably purchase a sword fromSwordsaxe and bring it to work in Georgia, but you probably want to do a little research before you do.
  3. In Florida, you can shoot to kill if you feel slightly threatened. Many states have “castle doctrines” that protect your use of a weapon on another human if you feel reasonably threatened, but you must be in your domicile or vehicle. In Florida, though, there are famous “stand your ground” laws that allow people to kill in public if someone feels slightly threatened. There have been many cases that were dismissed or wound up with acquittals because of these loose self-defense laws.
  4. More than half of American states allow you the right to walk around openly with a gun. In over 35 states, you can walk around with a firearm strapped to your belt or a holster. This is perhaps the most insane law because it gives people the right to arm themselves in public. Imagine walking into a Walmart and seeing someone walk down the aisle with a rifle strapped to their back. Indeed, though, this is perfectly legal – provided that the person has a permit.
  5. In Kanas, teachers can bring a gun to school. After the latest rash of school shootings, some legislators thought the smart answer would be to arm teachers. Well, in Kansas, one of those laws went through and now a kindergarten teacher can legally bring a gun to the classroom. The law may save a few students’ lives, but it could also endanger a few lives too. Nevertheless, though, the gun control battle wages on.

Family Law Report Susan Settenbrino Misconduct by Judges


I am Joe Thornton welcome to the family love report where we examine the problems and challenges facing our family law system today we are going to discuss a topic that I would have dismissed twenty years ago bias judges our modern-day judges impartial and fair are they influenced by personal agenda politics and money as the cost to running a successful election campaign continues to soar are more judges selling out to big law firms and other big money interests because the significance to this topic this will be four part series part 1 will cover to actual cases where judges were pursuing a hidden agenda part 2 will cover forms retribution suffered by attorneys who use a process called refusal to try to deal with judicial corruption par-3 will cover the problem with judicial elections and par-4 will cover the lack of oversight amor judicial branch of government to help us understand these complex topics we’re fortunate to have new york city attorney and author Susan said and reno who will give us an inside look at bias and corruption in in our courts Susan thank you very much for agreeing to talk to a summer sky it’s a privilege I I don’t think the lawyers ever said that to me before sup

I know you started out as a district attorney in New York City and eventually went into private practice what kinda practice did you have II mostly represented people concerned about the children and I I noticed that there was just I’m extreme bias in some cases ends it was very clear that they were that there was an engender it appeared in certain cases and and the bias words and striking so I would immediately and mass the court if they were acting in a bias or I’m engaging in conduct that was not appropriate because the most important thing to me West’s you ensure that my clients gosh fear access to the court and that was denied what else was there to talk about I need to know that the form was here well when it became apparent that the forum was not be and there was something else going on here I had to addressed immediately because why else was I idea use an example bias that you observed in a case there is in order to texan hearing and during the recess in the order to texan hearing my client has been went to his house mentor the houston we have sacked a house with his big trend the dow from wise broke the Curio scared the babysitter the baby two paintings and the stage in everything at the house he has acted and the judge would not deal with BS usage so I said how could you not do with the decision on if it actually hearing he is on your watch jury get lunch recessed you should want to hear about this my client had four girls she’s afraid to go home so she went to Family Court and she told the referee the chin because women supreme quick and she told the rectory what had happened and she told a Mac be the judge wasn’t allowing had to deal with this and the referee said my god it sounds clear enough and the judge gave her.

swallow_112213~48

In order to texan and when the judge keith has ordered detection home now she had wanted protection from Family Court at the Supreme Court Judge Stephen King now the judge was very angry because it made him look very bad so on March 12 2009 I had my clerk go to the courthouse to file my notion but the clerk in the supreme court said the judge is going to not hear it as an emergency will be submitted into chambers it was to meet into chambers it showed that on the computer system that has seen into chambers the peacock network afternoon opposing counsel just happens to go to the Supreme Court House in meet with the Giants just happens to be under the guise my motion in Dayton Tenn with three clock me send reviews not here oh wow they went engaged in a whole transcript with the judge was basically trying to protect the sound and I need the motion 30 cusack I’m a jungle the stacks and opposing counsel was or did she answer she not only fields answer she left the keys and the judge need uses has she removes herself from the case

I’ve become the target of investigations regarding this case four years later I go through just recently just the other summer I go to 13 hours ago interrogation it’s amazing I happiness Andy trying to find every way possible she trying to get me to say the judge didn’t do anything wrong they want me to treat tens that this judge had not engaged in misconduct and now we want to 10 that there was no Aki in San it’s incredible that the even here when I think about the case but for some reason gay David care very much in a using state funded resources to exonerate to you to protect the misconduct egregious misconduct that this Court can you give us one more example you so many different examples it would be I had one client I he was falsely accused I’m domestic violence and our and sexual abuse I’m and his Chinatown it was very Patni for us the the allegations giant the fuse to allow a hearing on the matter and just cap imposing

I am supervised visitation wendy was no basis and there was no evidence she did you back and all I kept asking the judge did you West idk least allow us immediate hearing on the facts because it was just a strategy to keep my client from his children but the judge would not allow that and what she would do you is just keep delaying the proceedings imposing supervised visitation and this I’m prejudice would just continue throughout the entire case and we weren’t use of being the the issue why might this judge’s been biased there are many reasons I’m you there are many reasons we can all think away somebody’s bias it could be as simple as just liking an attorney that they just now do you think there could have been a hidden financial motive she was making bforeseeing him to go to a particular.

I’ll supervised Center only need one this one particular supervised Center where he acted gay money to you have this sensors supervise the children do you think the center could have been funneling money back to the judge people are very busy usually and if you take your time had to act in a bias hostile manner she steered cases certain way and the evidence in a gender I DS usually a reason for that what the reasons are deserve investigation but since there’s no oversight you not gonna get actives interesting because in this case this case I actually couldn’t find it and the judge actually accused to South she didn’t one to DL with the fax and what was going on in her courtroom and sell my nikis went to a different John H supervised visitation was instantly removed and my clients was able to visit with his child again so it seems that some judges are letting their self-interests interfere with their ability to decide cases fairly we need judges who honest who are also bursts on the low as the debt resigning over on what is domestic bounds when is abuse.

I’m and how do we deal with this and how do we discerned what’s going on here because if somebody’s making false allegations and domestic violence or abuse right and actresses not address and they are allowed to be somebody’s horny eat them for their children be some false he s allegations that is unacceptable that is just very dangerous any judges protect the person who make lost allegations those same judges me protect the abuser in another instance we are women is remain the same I’m being abused this is going on it didn’t act in a way that is unlawful and his not concerned about what the Jews is that a lot of power and it is no oversight is extremely dangerous that includes part 1.avi interview with Susan Seddon Bruno part 2 will discuss how the courts retaliate against attorneys who expose bad judges and who don’t play the game in part 3 we will discuss the reasons why judges are allowed to act out of self-interest and the ineffectiveness our election process finally in part for we will discuss how our system lacks the checks and balances needed to prevent judicial bias and what can be done about it I’m juice orange and this is the family law reporter thank you damn in.

Canada AM Ask The Lawyer – Family Law

Country after custody battles are past the lawyer we continues with a look at this did the subject of family farm graffiti the this instead of beverly thompson the mightiest is a february twenty sixth at beverly thompson ever see ian coming up on canadair and family lives the focus of today’s act the lawyer peak statement and if you ever wondered what you need to know before signing a pre-nuptial family lawyer and he felt the moral asked that question others play joins us in just a couple things are asking where we continues with an area have a lot of it can get very messy family law covers everything from divorce to custody disputes to pre-nuptial here you can see your emails today’s anti felt cv as an senior partner at that scene family lobbied thank you for taking part in this in got some tough questions tack on a short amount of times we wanna get right to it this is firmly disperse question at what age can a child with which parakeet where she wants to resign what steps must be taken to allow this time happen well to begin with there isn’t a clear-cut age where child can decide what where they want us not sixteen or seventeen or eighteen is those pacific there’s not a magic age part of it depends on the maturity of the child the reasons for the child so chill Bernard a child who’s twelve or thirteen years old may express your opinions and if the matter was before court in Ontario court would appoint the office of the children’s lawyer may appoint the office of the children’s lawyer

Now would mean either a social worker and or lawyer would meet with the child here the child’s opinions and try to understand why the child wants to live with one parent or the other to ensure that the child isn’t just repeating what one parent wants them to say right his that’s the tough part is to make sure that it is in fact the child’s feelings articles that say okay uh… so the next question we have isn’t email this one is from broderick’s mike on my wife of thirty years and I split up the join me on the home she moved out five years ago and I still live in a house we both want to sell but she’s being slow in getting a staff at cvs refused to pay half the taxes can the insurance on our house it’s in the thousands what can i do in his situation he can commence accord action for the partition and sale of a home in the law is very straightforward that if there’s joint owners especially in a common law situation at the home would be sold the issue that he needs to consider and think about is what else is he going to raise does she have a claim for spousal support against him after thirty years relationship and if you take an aggressive tack for the sale of the home she may come and
say.

AAL-Father-Daughter

 

 

I want to spousal support now so that would mediate the fact that he says that she’s not paying for it and i think it’s a jointly owned home could he pushed for her dictate the property tactics to try but the offset for that would be you’re saying you’ve had the benefit of being in the home and if there is a very much of a mortgage how much do you have to pay to live there what would it compared it paying rent on a home so our next question ironing case in my fiancee has agreed to sign a pre-nuptial agreement what should i know before i sign it what’s at the including on my hands well before any pre-nuptial agreement we call the marriage contracts assigned you need to have full frank financial disclosure meaning you need to understand what agreement you’re getting yourself into what does your spouse make what did they have because what do you contracting oto and what and you need to consult a lawyer and make sure you have a way to review the cream because if somebody is giving you an agreement here twenty five years old that says i’m never going to pay disposal supporting and i’m not going to give you any division of a property well what happens thirty years later it’s a pretty unfair deal because i would be set aside but he shouldn’t sign it so in most cases it in this world of pre-nuptial agreements.

I guess in the cement why is it something that generally speaking is drawn up for the benefit of boat people aren’t does it tend to be some underlying it up who seems to think that that person has more money therefore you must suck well it usually somebody has a motivation to do it but the question is what’s the motivation of what’s the reason the water the objectives of it because if you want an agreement that is really one-sided like the one I just suggested it’s not good it probably will not be enforceable years later much like in the recent mccain in mccain case that was all over the news suddenly came changes rambling message remind us that’s the wallace uh… things passions a wells mechanics as one of the mckesson airs and they had to be marriage contract that was set aside by the court in the spousal support the wife got was about a hundred seventy five thousand dollars a month yet now I do remember that sentencing catch okay so um…

Lastly, we have a question to you won’t have to disclose all of my assets to my specified that my impaired absolutely in family law you need to disclose all of your income all your assets all your life bilities if you get an inheritance the important pieces from the day you receive it you need to show it coming in as an inheritance and you have to trace it all the way through to the date of separation so if you spend the inheritance you don’t get to keep it and the exception as well as if you put it into the matrimonial home for example paying down the mortgage which is what most people will do you know vote is jointly held therefore whatever money goes into a is also to let me help exactly otherwise an inherited so what you do if you have an inheritance that comes to you holiest before or during your hands off from a family law perspective if you get in here insuring the marriage too the best route to take is to go open investment account of a completely different institution and you deal with and leave the money in that account matic grow there don’t mingle up with anything else that’s offset against practical reality of the fact most people want their market share and you may want a protector with the merits contract at that point which it could do during the course of your marriage to ease that popular common

Now that people would draft at at a cassette and opposed nafta pilate exactly it’s not popular but that would be an option and but the practical reality again is what happens when you’re fifteen years into a marriage and you get inheritance and you go to your spouse and say i need a contract to protect my merits that may and the mayor treated well that could be a magnet for sure tell me what what what holds up in court and talking that renounced what are the what are the kinds of peanuts or greenest that are most likely to stand up what one of the weird exceptions in family law use that if I come into the marriage and i have five hundred thousand dollars my bank account when i separate i get to deduct that five hundred thousand so i think that’s what you had going yet exactly if what i had going into the marriage was my house and that hosts is still my matrimonial home on the date of marriage and i had five hundred thousand equity in it i have to share that because it was the matrimonial home and in addition to you that at home might be weren’t worth more money on the market

If we’re also kept double baghdad also but that’s less offensive because it’s not as if you’re losing out on what you brought in at least that’s growth that you shared during the course of the marriage so if you get a marriage contract it says i want to protect that five hundred thousand dollars and breaking into the marriage that take a contractor certainly going to apply vbut it’s hard to predict which type of contractors going to stick with certainty and not at the end of the day what’s really important news tryin be fair in the contravene the own try and do something that is really extreme and one-sided because that’s where judge is going to want to help out the other side and when you talk about it as a contact is it then have to be signed should should it be signed by a lawyer should it be like a will that’s notarized every year separation agreement marriage contract domestic contract not a real has to be signed and witnessed should it be done by a lawyer one of the first things that’s gonna happen with any contract is you’re gonna look at and say was their independent legal advice it’s not completely fatal if there wasn’t if there is it certainly gives a better opportunity to suggest that the side who doesn’t know like the contract uh…
knew and understood what they were getting themselves into okay trained for basement bouncing thank you so much for coming in and thank you for having me you back our past lawyer series continues tomorrow will we ask you questions about employment law.

Family Law Report Susan Settenbrino Lack of Oversight


I am joseph Morgan welcome to the family law report are we examine the problems and challenges facing our family law system this is parked for dinner series with Susan said in Bruno covering judicial bias and corruption so what recourse do we have when we encounter unbiased judge isn’t that why we have appeals courts I talk about that a lot in my book you don’t have appeals could let me tell you what you have outside the palace jackie’s also have to get your active and they also came from the same club in the lawsuit goes the same way and you could be a commodity that could be a lot of things but three-way don’t have a PO Energy Ltd the you had the best judges on the palate lappam the set this up why because you have this is by you go to courthouse you going because you need intervention whether its monetary you kids you like Each you going into this Court has your whole clip cases do we out your whole life is to be on your finances of lil you know depleted most people can’t survive that to get to the appellate level and let me tell you what’s wrong about that whole concept this is what’s dangerous if a judge is sitting on the bench and abusing his power in by a leading the cookie Judicial Conduct

I have a right my in the akc to say do something we need a we cite get this judge took the bench and get somebody who knows what you doing and let me have my day in quick watching I and my client have to go do an appellate process to hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands or millions of dollars to correct judicial misconduct that is not what it is now you supposed to be is the appellate process is to correct mistakes work aris war and creative by a judge he was acting good he engaging in Papa conduct and was usual doesn’t the government give your money back make your home when you win an appeal press the bomb winning in Apia let’s talk about green p.m. which we if you can a slipper something that you’re asking for and they send it back to the court to decide back you 1 does the government a you you are no consequences to the judges is no retribution for the that against and you X-rays don’t wanna go a good attorney doesn’t want to go through this process doesn’t wanna earn legal fees this way it even get key even the best cases the appellate level is a top yes was to deal with the lore even addressed attacks it you a judge using gauging you intellectual dishonesty and the Facebook loss the appellate level even the best circumstances is not going to get involved what about the oversight committees aren’t they

Solomonnorman1

supposed to respond to complaints and discipline bad judges we have state funded offices in the millions I guess cross the country in the billions family I’m and this was the police the judges and disposed at least the attorneys and let me tell you something you 20 ani: documentary that you know nothing ever happens if this and where you engage is in Portland you anti-gay she had nothing ever happens she to stop this abusive process well let me tell you that the law is the air these are the killers the ethics committee for the who the lawyer used ended the ethics committee for the judges the other chill is the supposed to make everything right US was to be able to go to the ethics committee NC his attorney has engaged in this misconduct in all the rules the air date me for joint claims is a big agent littlest motions a key and the same thing with the judge’s by in a politicized system if the people at the helm these offices I’m ensuring that their mind politically these offices will protect and able to hockey and they will further promote enable the misconduct in even corruption the questions so you’re saying the fox guarding the henhouse is a whole system you that’s now functioning as dangerous in at lax oversight and they’re all Disney these nobody home did not release

on these no attorney general is no d8 is no government nobody here too to address it it wanted the same political machine and the only people who were sacked green is dance the popular and we need to change it %um what’s the motive here whose pulling the strings in 10 they have to gain well you’re the one who made it back in stock naturally and say it’s a fifty billion dollar a year industry Justin panel on there are other a reason the words well he toma billions of dollars needs my just in the judiciary by Jim how’s the 78 each and hungry now we all the fans are going we see accounting up these budgets why because they create their own subjective reports hurry now is the subjective reports if the judiciary is Aki outside the school with their office you’re engaging in conduct questionable conduct if that is what’s going on we need to have an entity that has oversight I’ve heard people say that we can’t control the judiciary because if the separation government in three independent branches aren’t they supposed to have this level of a tournament let’s start with what he said because we do not have to be branches operating

I just sent you from the same political machines we have the legislative the executive and the Judiciary all independent the career development and survival do these political machine so the is no independence if you ask me and if you look at the fax it doesn’t seem to be any independence if your mom who’s happier they can be utilized they don’t believe there we are by from creating these changes constitutionally I don’t believe there we our bride drum seeking the form in oversight and I transparency in our clinton’s but nobody’s willing to do it not because they can t wait but because they were applauded the same political machine so you think we can do anything about this we have the power to the people we the ones who can change it weakening we can make sure the region man’s me form if we start applying this oversight exposing it to win it its that’s how you get need more time so what I’m hearing is that we have to stop moaning for judges just because they’re democrats republicans and we have to hold her other elected officials accountable to institute effective oversight of our courts such as your database that tracks the decision a beach judge in that way

we’ll be able to see if they’re showing favoritism toward any law firm or company or Class A people and vote them out of office asa personally think that judges should have term limits and should be prohibited from practicing law for at least three years after serving as a judge to avoid temptation at the all-star favoring a law firm that is likely to hire them at the end of their term Susan you’re very brave to speak out generate your book unchecked power we need more people like you who are not afraid to point out weaknesses in our system because it’s the only way it will be improved for the benefit of the people thank you very much I’m juice orange and this is the Family Law Report banking done in.

Law Videos – Family Law


Swan what is a divorce the divorce is going to court makes a legal decision that two persons are no longer married usually when there’s a divorce their number issues which get decided those issues are custody visitation alimony or spousal support as it’s sometimes called distribution of property and of course distribution have doubts and attorneys fees there are many different kinds a divorce many divorces are uncontested in an uncontested divorce the people are able to agree with regard to most of the issues or all the issues and the divorce is relatively quick and relatively inexpensive in a contested divorce the parties aren’t able to agree with regard to summer all the issues and ultimately their disagreement gets decided by the court the contested divorce can take anywhere from several months to several years.